← All scansEngine ActivityCandidates
COVERAGE SCAN · 5 SEPTEMBER 2026
The coverage scan of 5 September 2026.
Started , completed after 17 min 27 s. Scan RUN-20260905-b639cb0a.
Full globalA complete scheduled pass across the sports and markets GLINTARY is configured to review.
Elapsed time from the recorded start of this scan to its completion. Duration depends on the scope of the scan, the response time of the data source and the number of events and markets processed.
What this scan covered
Every figure above opens the rows behind it: the fixtures this scan looked at, the priced questions it evaluated on them, and each selectable side screening judged.
Board-day decisions at completion
These four figures are the board day's policy decisions as they stood when this scan completed, folded into the scan's row. They are not counts of this scan's own candidates; the links open the day's candidates, and the table below shows what became of this scan's own.
Initial candidates from this scan
An initial candidateInitial candidateA selection that passed deterministic screening and became eligible for deeper research.Open glossary → is the selection this scan ranked highest on an event, and the start of research rather than a recommendation. Most are declined after research.
| Event | Selection | Why it entered research consideration | Best observed odds | Minimum qualifying odds | Then |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| San Diego Padres vs New York YankeesBaseball · MLB · | Under 7.5 total runsTotal | Enough operators for a market reference · Price inside the freshness limit · Price above the de-vigged fair price · Operators disagree on the price | 2.07011 operators quoted this selection | 1.99Lowest qualifying odds at evaluation | Not deep-researched in this pass |
| Tommy Paul vs Carlos AlcarazTennis · ATP US Open · | Tommy Paul to winMoneyline | Enough operators for a market reference · Price inside the freshness limit · Price above the de-vigged fair price · Operators disagree on the price | 4.7505 operators quoted this selection | 4.60Lowest qualifying odds at evaluation | Declined after researchWhy → |
| El Paso Chihuahuas vs Las Vegas AviatorsBaseball · MiLB · | El Paso Chihuahuas to winMoneyline | Enough operators for a market reference · Price inside the freshness limit · Price above the de-vigged fair price · Operators disagree on the price | 2.5005 operators quoted this selection | 2.49Lowest qualifying odds at evaluation | Not deep-researched in this pass |
| Rosario Central vs Newells Old BoysFootball · Primera División - Argentina · | Over 2 total goalsTotal | Enough operators for a market reference · Price inside the freshness limit · Price above the de-vigged fair price · Operators disagree on the price | 2.0003 operators quoted this selection | 2.00Lowest qualifying odds at evaluation | Not deep-researched in this pass |
| Taylor Bevan vs Emmet BrennanBoxing · Boxing · | Emmet Brennan to winMoneyline | Enough operators for a market reference · Price inside the freshness limit · Price above the de-vigged fair price · Operators disagree on the price | 4.3004 operators quoted this selection | 4.30Lowest qualifying odds at evaluation | Not deep-researched in this pass |
| Nagoya Grampus vs FC Machida ZelviaFootball · J League · | Nagoya Grampus to winMatch Winner | Enough operators for a market reference · Price inside the freshness limit · Price above the de-vigged fair price · Operators disagree on the price | 3.4508 operators quoted this selection | 3.45Lowest qualifying odds at evaluation | Not deep-researched in this pass |
1 further selection cleared screening on the same events but ranked below the event's best; research takes one selection per event.
Researched from this scan
| Researched | Event | Candidate | Evidence gradeEvidence gradeThe research step's own grade for how strong the evidence behind a position is, from A to C.Open glossary → | Decision | Main reason | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Paul vs Carlos AlcarazTennis · ATP US Open · | Tommy Paul to winMoneyline | C | Declined after research | Dispersion implausible (and 4 more) | Why → |