GLINTARY

← This scanEventsMarkets

COVERAGE SCAN · OUTCOMES

The outcomes this scan evaluated.

An outcome is one selectable side of a market. This scan recorded 3,955 outcomes evaluated, completing . Screening judged every one of them; almost all were rejected on the spot.

Clear
PARTIAL ROW DETAIL
This scan recorded 3,955 outcomes; 3,945 can still be shown. The rows are rebuilt from screening rows that are pruned over time, and this scan ran before GLINTARY retained a coverage manifest of its own. The recorded aggregate is unchanged and nothing is reconstructed to fill the gap.

11 outcomes of 3,945 shown

EventOutcomeMarketLineOperators
Shandong Luneng Taishan FC vs Shenzhen Peng City FCFootball · Super League - ChinaShandong Luneng Taishan FC -0.75Spread-0.752
Shandong Luneng Taishan FC vs Shenzhen Peng City FCFootball · Super League - ChinaShandong Luneng Taishan FC -1Spread-12
Shandong Luneng Taishan FC vs Shenzhen Peng City FCFootball · Super League - ChinaShenzhen Peng City FC +0.75Spread+0.752
Shandong Luneng Taishan FC vs Shenzhen Peng City FCFootball · Super League - ChinaShenzhen Peng City FC +1Spread+12
Shandong Luneng Taishan FC vs Shenzhen Peng City FCFootball · Super League - ChinaShandong Luneng Taishan FC to winMatch Winner7
Shandong Luneng Taishan FC vs Shenzhen Peng City FCFootball · Super League - ChinaShenzhen Peng City FC to winMatch Winner7
Shandong Luneng Taishan FC vs Shenzhen Peng City FCFootball · Super League - ChinaDrawMatch Winner7
Shandong Luneng Taishan FC vs Shenzhen Peng City FCFootball · Super League - ChinaOver 3.25 total goalsTotal3.253
Shandong Luneng Taishan FC vs Shenzhen Peng City FCFootball · Super League - ChinaUnder 3.25 total goalsTotal3.253
Shandong Luneng Taishan FC vs Shenzhen Peng City FCFootball · Super League - ChinaOver 3.5 total goalsTotal3.52
Shandong Luneng Taishan FC vs Shenzhen Peng City FCFootball · Super League - ChinaUnder 3.5 total goalsTotal3.52

These rows are the coverage manifest this scan wrote when it completed. Data updated . They carry identifiers, labels and counts only: no odds, no evidence and no provider data.