GLINTARY
Morning Brief
GLINTARY

← All candidatesEngine ActivityThis scan

Football · Primera División - Argentina ·

Rosario Central vs Newells Old Boys

Over 2 total goals · Total

Declined after researchCandidate CAND-20260906-a6f8b61e
NOT AN OFFICIAL GLINTARY POSITION
This candidate was researched and did not become a published position. Nothing here was ever on the Board, in the Ledger or on X. Researched, assessed on merit and not published. Most candidates are meant to end here. The engine records this decision as PASS, which means the candidate passed through without a position.

Decision

Outcome
Declined after research
Main reason
Evidence grade below the lockable set (and 3 more)
Decided
Policy
v1.1

Gates that did not pass

  • EvidenceToo few distinct sourcesFailed
  • FreshnessNewest supporting source older than the limitFailed
  • UncertaintyEvidence grade below the lockable setFailed
  • Adversarial reviewAdversarial review found a blocking objectionFailed
Full gate trace (9 gates)
  1. Event integrityReal, identified, pre-match fixture inside the lock windowPassed
  2. EvidenceToo few distinct sourcesFailed
  3. PriceRecorded price clears the minimum qualifying oddsPassed
  4. Price sourcePrice attributable to an identified source (global reference only)Passed
  5. FreshnessNewest supporting source older than the limitFailed
  6. UncertaintyEvidence grade below the lockable setFailed
  7. Adversarial reviewAdversarial review found a blocking objectionFailed
  8. DuplicationNo existing position on this eventPassed
  9. PresentationPresentation compliantPassed

Why it entered research

Deterministic screening facts recorded when the scan admitted this selection. No model was involved at this step.

  • Enough operators for a market reference
  • Price inside the freshness limit
  • Price above the de-vigged fair price
  • Operators disagree on the price
Screened
Market
Total
Best verified price
2.000
Market reference
1.810 · 3 operators
Minimum Qualifying Odds
2.00 · edge 4.00%

Research

Evidence grade CAdversarial review · Blocking

Market Analysis Note

An evaluation of the current pricing dynamics between the best global price and the broader market reference median.

Primary case

  • The current best global price is offered by Bovada at two point zero zero zero (2.000) under odds evidence ID OE-cff5418ad7129aed.

Market context

  • The market reference price is one point eight one zero (1.810) derived from the median of three operators, with a proportional de-vig fair decimal price of one point nine two three (1.923).
  • Market price dispersion across the three observed operators is ten point five zero percent (10.50%).
  • There is currently only one price sample recorded at two point zero zero zero (2.000) with no opening price or movement percentage available, and no external news context was found.

What the price requires

  • Requires validation that the available price of two point zero zero zero (2.000) on Bovada is fully executable and accurate rather than a lagging or stale odds update.

Major uncertainty

The position relies entirely on a single price sample from Bovada at 2.000 while the median market reference price across the three observed operators is significantly lower at 1.810, indicating that the available 2.000 price may be a stale quote, a sharp outlier, or mispriced relative to the broader market consensus.

Adversarial review

The strongest case against the candidate, as recorded before the decision.

The position relies entirely on a single price sample from Bovada at 2.000 while the median market reference price across the three observed operators is significantly lower at 1.810, indicating that the available 2.000 price may be a stale quote, a sharp outlier, or mispriced relative to the broader market consensus.

Blocking questions

  • Is the Bovada price of 2.000 currently executable in the US region or is it a stale/ghost quote?
  • What explains the large spread between the median market reference price of 1.810 and Bovada's price of 2.000?
  • Can we verify liquidity and maximum allowable stakes at the 2.000 price point on Bovada?

Why the market may simply be right

  • The broader market reference median of 1.810 suggests that the consensus across multiple operators prices the outcome much lower than 2.000, meaning Bovada may simply be offering an uncorrected outlier or stale line.