← All candidatesEngine ActivityThis scan
San Diego Padres vs New York Yankees
Under 7.5 total runs · Total
Decision
- Outcome
- Declined after research
- Main reason
- Dispersion implausible (and 4 more)
- Decided
- Policy
- v1.1
Gates that did not pass
- EvidenceToo few distinct sourcesFailed
- PriceDispersion implausibleFailed
- FreshnessNewest supporting source older than the limitFailed
- UncertaintyEvidence grade below the lockable setFailed
- Adversarial reviewAdversarial review found a blocking objectionFailed
Full gate trace (9 gates)
- Event integrityReal, identified, pre-match fixture inside the lock windowPassed
- EvidenceToo few distinct sourcesFailed
- PriceDispersion implausibleFailed
- Price sourcePrice attributable to an identified source (global reference only)Passed
- FreshnessNewest supporting source older than the limitFailed
- UncertaintyEvidence grade below the lockable setFailed
- Adversarial reviewAdversarial review found a blocking objectionFailed
- DuplicationNo existing position on this eventPassed
- PresentationPresentation compliantPassed
Why it entered research
Deterministic screening facts recorded when the scan admitted this selection. No model was involved at this step.
- Enough operators for a market reference
- Price inside the freshness limit
- Price above the de-vigged fair price
- Operators disagree on the price
- Screened
- Market
- Total
- Best verified price
- 2.070
- Market reference
- 1.840 · 11 operators
- Minimum Qualifying Odds
- 1.99 · edge 7.81%
Research
Research Position Note
This position note reviews the current market pricing and operational risks based on available multi-operator data and red team objections.
Primary case
- The current best global price is offered by bovada.
Market context
- The market reference price is established as the median across multiple operators.
- Movement data is limited to a single sample without an opening price comparison.
- The dispersion percentage across the operators reflects moderate variance in the market.
What the price requires
- Assuming that the price offered by bovada at 2.050 is fully executable and available in sufficient size.
- Assuming that the 12.02 percent dispersion reflects normal market inefficiency rather than a stale quote or bad line at bovada.
Major uncertainty
The target price of 2.050 relies on a single outlier operator (bovada) that is significantly higher than the median market reference price of 1.830, indicating that the price may be stale, limited by stake restrictions, or representative of a sharp disagreement by the broader market.
Adversarial review
The strongest case against the candidate, as recorded before the decision.
The target price of 2.050 relies on a single outlier operator (bovada) that is significantly higher than the median market reference price of 1.830, indicating that the price may be stale, limited by stake restrictions, or representative of a sharp disagreement by the broader market.
Blocking questions
- Is the 2.050 price at bovada still actively available and executable at the required stake size?
- Why is there a 12.02 percent dispersion across the 11 operators, and does the market reference median of 1.830 represent a more accurate consensus?
- How long has the bovada price been sitting at 2.050 without movement or correction?
Why the market may simply be right
- The median market reference price of 1.830 established across 11 operators suggests that the broader market consensus views the true probability differently than the single best global price of 2.050.