← All candidatesEngine Activity
Emma Navarro vs Karolina Muchova
Emma Navarro to win · Moneyline
Decision
- Outcome
- Pass
- Main reason
- Evidence grade below the lockable set (and 3 more)
- Decided
- 2026-09-04 07:39:37 UTC
- Policy
- v1.1
Gates that did not pass
- EvidenceToo few distinct sourcesFailed
- FreshnessConfirmed personnel information required and not yet publishedFailed
- UncertaintyEvidence grade below the lockable setFailed
- Adversarial reviewAdversarial review found a blocking objectionFailed
Full gate trace (9 gates)
- Event integrityReal, identified, pre-match fixture inside the lock windowPassed
- EvidenceToo few distinct sourcesFailed
- PriceRecorded price clears the minimum qualifying oddsPassed
- Price sourcePrice attributable to an identified source (global reference only)Passed
- FreshnessConfirmed personnel information required and not yet publishedFailed
- UncertaintyEvidence grade below the lockable setFailed
- Adversarial reviewAdversarial review found a blocking objectionFailed
- DuplicationNo existing position on this eventPassed
- PresentationPresentation compliantPassed
Why it entered research
Deterministic screening facts recorded when the scan admitted this selection. No model was involved at this step.
- Price above the de-vigged fair price
- Enough operators for a market reference
- Price inside the freshness limit
- Screened
- 2026-09-04 07:07:01 UTC
- Market
- Moneyline
- Best verified price
- 4.670
- Market reference
- 4.200 · 11 operators
- Minimum Qualifying Odds
- 4.57 · edge 5.78%
Research
US Open 2026: Karolina Muchova vs. Emma Navarro Market Note
An evaluation of the US Open 2026 fixture between Karolina Muchova and Emma Navarro shows a top market price of 4.670 against a median reference of 4.200, but foundational fixture claims remain unsupported.
Primary case
- Best globally available price of 4.670 offered by betonlineag as observed on September 4, 2026 at UTC 07:05.
- Market reference price is 4.200 across eleven operators, yielding a proportional de-vigged fair price of 4.415 and fair win probability of 22.65%.
Market context
- Price dispersion across eleven operators stands at 11.19% with an market overround of 5.11%.
- No opening price is available for comparison, with current sample price recorded at 4.420 based on sources CS-5551e4f3-b45 and CS-8e36ae78-fb9.
What the price requires
- The top price of 4.670 requires implied probability expectations to clear the de-vigged fair threshold of 22.65%.
Major uncertainty
The foundational claims CL-287afdd8-d54 and CL-dad24cb0-9de, which establish the match schedule, round, and player seedings, are entirely UNSUPPORTED.
Material findings and their support
- Availability · material · against the caseEmma Navarro is scheduled to face Karolina Muchova in the third round of the US Open Women's Singles on September 4, 2026.Unsupported
- Statistic · against the caseKarolina Muchova is the No. 7 seed and Emma Navarro is the No. 26 seed in the US Open 2026 fixture.Unsupported
Adversarial review
The strongest case against the candidate, as recorded before the decision.
The foundational claims CL-287afdd8-d54 and CL-dad24cb0-9de, which establish the match schedule, round, and player seedings, are entirely UNSUPPORTED. Locking a position on an unverified fixture is indefensible.
Blocking questions
- Why are both foundational claims (CL-287afdd8-d54 and CL-dad24cb0-9de) regarding the match occurrence and player seedings marked as UNSUPPORTED?
- Can we verify the fixture details using reliable official tournament sources before locking this position?
- Why is there no opening price available, and how can we evaluate the trend with only 1 sample?
- What is the driver behind the 11.19% price dispersion among the 11 operators, and does it indicate that the target price of 4.670 is an outlier or soon to be adjusted?
Why the market may simply be right
- The high price dispersion of 11.19% across 11 operators suggests that the market is in active price discovery or highly volatile, meaning individual operator odds may rapidly shift to correct any perceived inefficiencies.