GLINTARY
Morning Brief
GLINTARY

← All candidatesEngine ActivityThis scan

American Football · NCAAF ·

Kennesaw State Owls vs West Georgia Wolves

Under 49.5 total points · Total

PassCandidate CAND-20260904-d13338a4
NOT AN OFFICIAL GLINTARY POSITION
This candidate was researched and did not become a published position. Nothing here was ever on the Board, in the Ledger or on X. Assessed on merit and declined. Most candidates are meant to end here.

Decision

Outcome
Pass
Main reason
Evidence grade below the lockable set (and 3 more)
Decided
2026-09-03 22:05:55 UTC
Policy
v1.1

Gates that did not pass

  • EvidenceToo few distinct sourcesFailed
  • PriceRecorded price below the minimum qualifying oddsFailed
  • UncertaintyEvidence grade below the lockable setFailed
  • Adversarial reviewAdversarial review raised a blocking questionFailed
Full gate trace (9 gates)
  1. Event integrityReal, identified, pre-match fixture inside the lock windowPassed
  2. EvidenceToo few distinct sourcesFailed
  3. PriceRecorded price below the minimum qualifying oddsFailed
  4. Price sourcePrice attributable to an identified source (global reference only)Passed
  5. FreshnessPrice, evidence and personnel information within the age limitsPassed
  6. UncertaintyEvidence grade below the lockable setFailed
  7. Adversarial reviewAdversarial review raised a blocking questionFailed
  8. DuplicationNo existing position on this eventPassed
  9. PresentationPresentation compliantPassed

Why it entered research

Deterministic screening facts recorded when the scan admitted this selection. No model was involved at this step.

  • Enough operators for a market reference
  • Price inside the freshness limit
  • Price above the de-vigged fair price
  • Operators disagree on the price
Screened
2026-09-03 21:58:43 UTC
Market
Total
Best verified price
1.940
Market reference
1.870 · 4 operators
Minimum Qualifying Odds
2.05 · edge -1.97%

Research

Evidence grade UNGRADEDAdversarial review · Medium

Research Position Note

The current best global price is offered by betmgm at 2.100, while the market reference price determined using the median across sampled operators is 1.885.

Primary case

  • The current best global price is offered by betmgm.

Market context

  • The market reference price is determined using the median across a number of operators.
  • No prior opening price samples are available to establish a directional movement percentage.
  • The market displays a distinct level of dispersion across the sampled operators.

What the price requires

  • The market reference price is 1.885, which is substantially lower than the BetMGM price of 2.100, indicating that the majority of sampled operators heavily disagree with BetMGM's pricing and may reflect the correct probability.

Major uncertainty

The position relies on a very small sample size of only 4 operators, and no opening price samples are available to establish directional movement, creating high vulnerability to outlier pricing at BetMGM.

Adversarial review

The strongest case against the candidate, as recorded before the decision.

The position relies on a very small sample size of only 4 operators, and no opening price samples are available to establish directional movement, creating high vulnerability to outlier pricing at BetMGM.

Blocking questions

  • What is the liquidity and maximum bet size accepted at BetMGM at the 2.100 price?
  • Why are only 4 operators contributing to the market reference?
  • Is the BetMGM price stale compared to the other 3 operators?

Why the market may simply be right

  • The market reference price is 1.885, which is substantially lower than the BetMGM price of 2.100, indicating that the majority of sampled operators heavily disagree with BetMGM's pricing and may reflect the correct probability.