GLINTARY

← All candidatesEngine ActivityThis scan

Baseball · MLB ·

Cleveland Guardians vs Detroit Tigers

Cleveland Guardians -1.5 · Spread

PassCandidate CAND-20260904-946433f8
NOT AN OFFICIAL GLINTARY POSITION
This candidate was researched and did not become a published position. Nothing here was ever on the Board, in the Ledger or on X. Assessed on merit and declined. Most candidates are meant to end here.

Decision

Outcome
Pass
Main reason
Evidence grade below the lockable set (and 3 more)
Decided
2026-09-03 23:59:55 UTC
Policy
v1.1

Gates that did not pass

  • EvidenceToo few distinct sourcesFailed
  • FreshnessConfirmed personnel information required and not yet publishedFailed
  • UncertaintyEvidence grade below the lockable setFailed
  • Adversarial reviewAdversarial review raised a blocking questionFailed
Full gate trace (9 gates)
  1. Event integrityReal, identified, pre-match fixture inside the lock windowPassed
  2. EvidenceToo few distinct sourcesFailed
  3. PriceRecorded price clears the minimum qualifying oddsPassed
  4. Price sourcePrice attributable to an identified source (global reference only)Passed
  5. FreshnessConfirmed personnel information required and not yet publishedFailed
  6. UncertaintyEvidence grade below the lockable setFailed
  7. Adversarial reviewAdversarial review raised a blocking questionFailed
  8. DuplicationNo existing position on this eventPassed
  9. PresentationPresentation compliantPassed

Why it entered research

Deterministic screening facts recorded when the scan admitted this selection. No model was involved at this step.

  • Enough operators for a market reference
  • Price inside the freshness limit
  • Price above the de-vigged fair price
  • Operators disagree on the price
Screened
2026-09-03 23:52:13 UTC
Market
Spread
Best verified price
2.750
Market reference
2.580 · 7 operators
Minimum Qualifying Odds
2.75 · edge 3.62%

Research

Evidence grade CAdversarial review · Low

Detroit Tigers vs. Cleveland Guardians at Progressive Field

An analysis of the matchup between the Detroit Tigers and the Cleveland Guardians hosted at Progressive Field, evaluating available market pricing and consensus lines.

Primary case

  • Progressive Field is set to host the matchup between the Detroit Tigers and the Cleveland Guardians.

Market context

  • The current best global price is offered on Bovada with an observed timestamp reflecting late evening.
  • The market reference price is determined using the median of multiple operators across several tracked sportsbooks.
  • The opening price and movement percentage are currently unrecorded as only a single sample is available.
  • The market shows a dispersion percentage calculated across a handful of participating operators.
  • The market reference median price of 2.575 across 6 operators suggests the consensus probability is higher than the best available global price implies, meaning the consensus may correctly account for risks not captured in the edge calculation.

What the price requires

  • The Bovada price of 2.750 must be currently actionable and executable rather than a delayed or stale line.
  • The median of 6 operators must accurately reflect the true market consensus probability without lagging.

Major uncertainty

The edge relies on a single operator's price (Bovada at 2.750) diverging from a market reference median of 2.575, which could represent a stale or isolated quote rather than a true mispricing.

Material findings and their support

  • Venue · for the caseProgressive Field is set to host the matchup between the Detroit Tigers and the Cleveland Guardians.Supported

Adversarial review

The strongest case against the candidate, as recorded before the decision.

The edge relies on a single operator's price (Bovada at 2.750) diverging from a market reference median of 2.575, which could represent a stale or isolated quote rather than a true mispricing.

Blocking questions

  • Is the Bovada price of 2.750 currently live and fully executable for the desired stake size?
  • Why does a 6.80% dispersion exist across the 6 tracked operators, and does Bovada represent an outlier due to delayed updates?

Why the market may simply be right

  • The market reference median price of 2.575 across 6 operators suggests the consensus probability is higher than the best available global price implies, meaning the consensus may correctly account for risks not captured in the edge calculation.